U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE DAILY PRESS BRIEFING (May 30, 1995)
From: hristu@arcadia.harvard.edu (Dimitrios Hristu)
Subject: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE DAILY PRESS BRIEFING (May 30, 1995)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
DAILY PRESS BRIEFING
I N D E X
Tuesday, May 30, 1995
Briefer: Winston Lord
Christine Shelly
[...]
TURKEY
Discussions on Operation Provide Comfort ..................18-19
GREECE
U.S. Visit of Greek Defense Minister Arsenis ..............19
FORMER YUGOSLAVIA
Discussion of Developments at NAC Ministerial Meeting .....19
Contact Group Foreign Ministers Meeting ...................19-20
Meeting of EU Foreign Ministers ...........................20
Ambassador Frasure's Trip to Belgrade .....................21
Bosnian Serb Remarks on UN Agreements .....................21-22
Holding of UN Peacekeepers ................................22
Proposals to Reduce Vulnerability of Troops ...............22-23
Efforts to Involve Former President Jimmy Carter ..........23
CYPRUS ISLANDS
Talks in London ...........................................22
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
DAILY PRESS BRIEFING
DPB #77
TUESDAY, MAY 30, 1995, 12:59 P.M.
(ON THE RECORD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
[...]
Q Christine, two U.S. delegations, separate U.S. delegations,
are in Ankara right now discussing with Turkish officials "Provide
Comfort." What is the purpose? Why are they discussing about "Provide
Comfort?"
MS. SHELLY: About why two American officials, or are you talking
abut embassy personnel?
Q No, no, no. From the State Department, they are in Ankara
right now.
MS. SHELLY: For discussions on "Provide Comfort?"
Q "Comfort."
MS. SHELLY: I don't have anything specific for you on that except
that we do have consultations with Turkish authorities on the operation
from time to time. I assume those are part of periodic consultations
which we do have. But I'll be happy to check on it and see if we can
maybe come back to that tomorrow with some more information.
Q The Greek Defense Minister, Mr. Arsenis, is in Washington to
hold talks with American officials. Can you tell us something about the
agenda?
MS. SHELLY: I don't have anything with me today, but I'll be happy
to try to work something up for tomorrow.
Q Would it be a safe guess that you're not taking any questions
on Bosnia?
MS. SHELLY: No. I'd be happy to go through what I've got, if
you'd like. I can start off by just reviewing the state of play of
what's been happening out in Europe.
First of all, as you know, there have been several different
meetings which have taken place. The most recent treatment of Bosnia
was, of course, at the NAC Ministerial itself.
One of the things that the NATO Council did -- this is, of course,
at Ministerial level -- that it did early in its meeting today -- was to
actually have a discussion and review all of the latest developments in
the former Yugoslavia. There is a separate stand-alone -- a NATO
statement -- which we'd be happy to make available to you in our Press
Office.
I won't read the whole thing, but among other things the statement
condemned the escalation of violence. It condemned the shelling of safe
areas and the killing and seizing of U.N. peacekeepers by Bosnian Serbs.
It demanded the release of U.N. peacekeepers and observers held hostage
by the Bosnian Serbs, who would be held accountable for their safe
return. It supported the efforts of the Contact Group to bring peace to
the area. It reaffirmed NATO's willingness to help protect U.N. forces
and to enforce the No-Fly Zone and to maintain the maritime embargo. It
also expressed NATO's readiness to support the reinforcement of U.N.
forces in the former Yugoslavia.
The full NATO Council deliberation on Bosnia, of course, also
followed a meeting the previous day with the Foreign Ministers of
France, Spain, Germany, and the European Union Commissioner for External
Affairs representing the Troika, and the Foreign Ministers of the United
Kingdom and of Russia -- with, of course, Secretary of State Warren
Christopher.
They met and issued a statement. I assume that you've seen that.
In Secretary Christopher's intervention before the NATO Ministerial
Council this morning, he stressed the understandings that had been
reached in the context of the Contact Group Ministers Meeting. The
night before he stressed five points, and let me just quickly go through
those.
First, he stressed that the Ministers had agreed that UNPROFOR
should remain in Bosnia-Herzegovina to carry out its important mission.
Secondly, that UNPROFOR should move rapidly to reduce the
vulnerability of its forces by regrouping units and avoiding activities
that could unduly endanger their safety.
Thirdly, that steps to assure the freedom of movement and safety of
UNPROFOR safety should be taken and that the military experts would be
asked to examine the specific proposals of several of the nations --
France, United Kingdom, among others -- with a view to achieving that
objective.
Fourth, there was also agreement on the need to enhance the
capability and strength of UNPROFOR to assure that it can carry out its
mission safely and effectively,
and the U.S. intended to provide appropriate support toward that end.
And, finally, the Group agreed to continue to pursue the efforts to
obtain recognition of Bosnia-Herzegovina by Serbia and to achieve an
effective closure of the border between Serbia and Bosnia-Herzegovina.
So those are the main points, as I mentioned, were in Secretary
Christopher's remarks this morning and were accurately reflecting the
statement that was adopted by the Contact Group Ministers.
There had also been a meeting, as I think you know, earlier in the
day of the EU Foreign Ministers, after which a statement had also been
issued.
So I think you have three very clear actions by European and NATO
authorities, and also Contact Group authorities, reflecting the thinking
of the highest levels of governments .
Q Robert Frasure is going back for talks with Milosevic?
MS. SHELLY: I understand that he's going to depart tomorrow.
Q To go to Belgrade?
MS. SHELLY: Yes -- to go back to Belgrade.
Q What's he taking? What sort of offer is he taking with him?
MS. SHELLY: The general point that I've made, which is the need to
continue with the diplomacy and try to get the earliest possible FRY
recognition of Bosnia-Herzegovina, and obviously also to strengthen the
border closures. Those are the principal issues that he will take, and
obviously also the issue related to sanctions suspension and how that's
going to be treated in the Security Council. That's, obviously, also an
issue he'll be discussing.
Q Recognition only of Bosnia, is that what you're saying?
MS. SHELLY: Recognition of Bosnia-Herzegovina.
Q not Croatia?
MS. SHELLY: That's the issue that he's working on at this point.
Q Is he going by himself, or will there be any other Contact
Group envoys with him?
MS. SHELLY: I don't have any information on that specifically, but
I'll be happy to check.
Q There are so many points in these recent wires. One I heard
this morning from a broadcast from Sarajevo was that the Serbs have
discontinued their association with the treaty that invited the U.N. to
come and be in Bosnia. They have withdrawn.
Question One: Is that correct? Have the Bosnian Serbs announced
that they are no longer accepting the U.N.?
MS. SHELLY: The Bosnian Serbs -- my understanding is that they
have said something to the effect that they no longer considered the
various U.N. agreements to be operative. I don't have the precise
language of what they've said. That is obviously a worrisome
development and certainly something that we hope is perhaps more remarks
associated with the heat of the moment than something that they really
intend to commit themselves to.
Q Would it mandate the U.N. to be in Bosnia than be negated if,
indeed, the Serbians in Bosnia said "No"?
MS. SHELLY: No. It's not up to the Bosnian Serbs to be able to
pull the plug on the U.N. mandate. The U.N. mandate is something that
was adopted by the U.N. Security Council, and that remains the
authoritative body on mandates.
Q No. But then, finally, the U.N. authorities currently -- are
they negotiating with the Serbian elements in a dialogue?
MS. SHELLY: You're talking about the Bosnian Serbs?
Q The Bosnian Serbs in Pale -- are they negotiating to get the
hostages released currently?
MS. SHELLY: I think that's a question that is most appropriately
directed to the U.N. There certainly have been contacts between them
toward that end; that is certainly also something that you get a very
strong cry from the entire international community calling for those
U.N. peacekeepers who are being held to be released.
Q What is the Administration's evaluation of the recent round
of Cyprus talks which was held in London?
MS. SHELLY: I don't have a recent evaluation to go into today, but
let me put that in the category of items. I'll check and see if we can
work up something for you for tomorrow.
Q All right.
Q On Bosnia --
MS. SHELLY: Yes.
Q -- one of the points you mentioned was reducing the
vulnerability of the UNPROFOR troops. There are reports on the ground
that certain cities like Gorazde, Tuzla, and Srebrenica are now being
evacuated. Does this mean that the safehavens -- Sarajevo and Bihac and
others -- will no longer be in that category, or what does this
reduction of vulnerability mean?
MS. SHELLY: Okay. As to the reduction of vulnerability, there are
a number of specific proposals that were put forward by some of the
countries that have troops on the ground. Those are proposals that will
be evaluated by the NATO military authorities, and also presumably in
connection with the U.N.
Also, I think, there are a number of issues which basically were
reverted by NATO Ministers for further study by those who have been most
directly involved in the situation on the ground. But I'm told in the
context of the Contact Group discussions yesterday that there was no
talk about abandoning the eastern enclaves. This is something that
obviously has come up as perhaps a way to make the presence there easier
to protect. But that is not an idea that is getting any serious
consideration at this point. Keeping the U.N. presence there is
something which is, of course, mandated by U.N. Security Council
resolutions. We fully support them.
It's certainly our impression from the discussions within NATO, but
also the Contact Group discussions, that there is continuing support for
keeping the U.N. presence in the enclaves.
Q But, Christine, has there been any thought of getting Jimmy
Carter involved in any of this now?
MS. SHELLY: Not that I have heard about.
Q Thank you.
MS. SHELLY: Thank you.
(The press briefing concluded at l:50 p.m.)
END
|