U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE DAILY PRESS BRIEFING (May 19, 1995)
From: hristu@arcadia.harvard.edu (Dimitrios Hristu)
Subject: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE DAILY PRESS BRIEFING (May 19, 1995)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
DAILY PRESS BRIEFING
I N D E X
Friday, May 19, 1995
Briefer: Nicholas Burns
[...]
TURKEY/GREECE
Cyprus ...............................................12-13
[...]
FORMER YUGOSLAVIA
Ambassador Frasure Talks in Belgrade .................19-22
Fighting Update ......................................20
UNPROFOR .............................................20
Secretary Christopher/Secretary Hurd Discussions .....20
[...]
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
DAILY PRESS BRIEFING
DPB #71
FRIDAY, MAY 19, 1995, 1:04 P. M.
(ON THE RECORD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)
Q According to reports, a Greek senior diplomat from New York
City dispatched recently to Athens a secret report disclosing, inter
alia, that Under Secretary Holbrooke and his associates here at the
Department of State are promoting actually the unilateral declaration of
independence illegally declared by the Turkish-Cypriot state as a
solution to the Cyprus problem for the creation of a configurated
Cypriot state, 21 years after the Turkish invasion and occupation.
Could you please, once again, clarify the U.S. position, vis-a-vis
to this specific issue?
MR. BURNS: Assistant Secretary Richard Holbrooke has been a prime
mover in trying to increase the level of U.S. Government attention to
our long-term effort to resolve the difficulties between the Turkish and
Greek communities on Cyprus. He is in no way trying to encourage a
unilateral declaration of independence by the Turkish republic of
northern Cyprus.
We have two special negotiators involved in this. We have a very
able Ambassador in Cyprus, whom you know quite well, who works on this
problem. And Assistant Secretary Holbrooke has given it a lot of
attention since he took office last year. We have respect for both
communities. We are dealing on the basis of equality here in our
diplomatic contacts with both communities. We're not encouraging any
unilateral measures. We're encouraging mutual agreement by the
communities to resolve the problems of Cyprus.
[...]
Q Could we go to Bosnia for a quick question. Anything new on
the talks with Milosevic? There are some people who think that Mr.
Holbrooke is there or headed that way.
MR. BURNS: I can assure you that Assistant Secretary Holbrooke is
in Washington at the Department of State this morning. There have been
sightings. I can also assure you that Deputy Assistant Secretary of
State, Ambassador Bob Frasure, is in Belgrade. He has been in Belgrade
since, I believe, Monday morning. He has had a series of intensive,
serious talks with the Serbian President, Mr. Milosevic.
Those talks are being held on behalf of the Contact Group which
decided a week ago today that we should try again to see if we can
convince Mr. Milosevic to accept the Contact Group offer of limited
sanctions relief if Serbia recognizes Bosnia. That is the issue at play
here.
If we felt that there was no chance of that happening, Ambassador
Frasure wouldn't have spent five days in Belgrade. I have nothing to
announce, though. I am not in a position even to describe the talks in
any detail, because we're not in the business of doing that, and I
wouldn't even lead you in the direction that we're making progress or
we're not making progress. We're simply going to have to wait for them
both to come down from the mountain and to see what emerges.
But it's a very serious effort by the United States on behalf of
the Contact Group to make an attempt to achieve something quite
substantial, because if this agreement is reached, Serbia would in fact
be saying that Bosnia exists, that Bosnia should exist and will continue
to exist. Therefore a very important leader in the Serbian community in
the Balkans would have said that the dream of a greater Serbia must be
quite limited and can't be as expansive as some of them would like to
have it.
So these are important discussions, and they're ongoing. In
Bosnia, in general, the fighting continues in Sarajevo. The United
Nations continues its review of the mission of UNPROFOR, and the
position of the United States remains quite clear. UNPROFOR's role must
be strengthened. The ability of UNPROFOR and NATO to enforce the U.N.
resolutions must be strengthened, and must be much more aggressive.
There have to be efforts to try to reimpose or rebuild a cease-fire
in the area. Secretary Hurd was here two days ago for discussions with
Secretary Christopher, and they had a long discussion of this. When
Secretary Christopher goes to the NATO meetings at the end of the month,
he'll look forward to discussions with the new French Foreign Minister,
Mr. de Charette.
Q I understand you can't talk about the consultations in
Belgrade, but how about the offer itself -- the Contact Group's offer.
There's at least one publication that seems to think that has changed
from recognizing Bosnia and its government to now just recognizing the
territorial outline of Bosnia, but is that accurate?
MR. BURNS: It's a good question. Because Ambassador Frasure is
currently engaged in the discussions, I just don't want to go into the
detail of what the offer is or what the discussion around that offer has
been. But as soon as he comes back, we'll be in a position to address
that in more specific terms.
Q Can you say anything about to what extent sanctions would be
lifted in exchange for Serbian recognition?
MR. BURNS: The Contact Group offer is for partial sanctions
relief. What that means is suspension of certain types of sanctions.
It is not an offer to lift sanctions, and Ambassador Frasure has been
very clear about that.
Q What partial? What parts? How much?
MR. BURNS: Again, David, I think I'm going to just refrain from
detailed comment until Ambassador Frasure returns.
Q There's give-and-take, then, in this. It's not -- you're
indicating there's some negotiating --
MR. BURNS: I'm just saying that the Contact Group developed an
offer which it confirmed at Frankfurt at the meeting a week ago today,
and that offer has been made. But what I don't want to do is go into
the details of the offer or through the conversation this week until
Ambassador Frasure returns, because I have not been in a position to
talk to him.
Q You're saying there has been a new offer developed. There
was a new offer developed a week ago. This is not the old offer, which
you indicated just a minute ago.
MR. BURNS: I'm saying there's an offer on the table, and I
described the basic offer. I want to leave it at that.
Q Which was developed a week ago.
MR. BURNS: Which was confirmed a week ago. The offer in most
respects resembles quite closely the offer that's been on the table for
quite some time with Serbia.
Q And that offer included -- stipulates not only the boundaries
of Bosnia, that is recognizing the existence of Bosnia, but he has to
accept the map, too, right?
MR. BURNS: Mr. Milosevic has already accepted the Contact Group
map and plan. I believe he did so in July 1994. That's not at issue
here. What's at issue is whether or not Serbia will choose to recognize
Bosnia, and that is an issue that we have been pressing for a long, long
time, but quite intensively over the last couple of months.
Q Have you talked to the Croatians, Slovenia and the other
republics? I mean, that was part of the whole package before. Is it
now just Bosnia?
MR. BURNS: The offer is not -- well, the offer is focused on
Bosnia, but we'll just have to wait until Ambassador Frasure gets back
before I'm in a position or he's in a position to give you a complete
rendition of what happened, and I hope that he'll be able to come back
and say that he's made progress. But I just don't know at this time.
Q Can you tell us what the representative of the United States
has taken to Belgrade or what -- the offer that he's taken? I mean --
MR. BURNS: Sid, I don't find it surprising that I'm unwilling to
share the details of our negotiating posture with the Serbian
Government. I don't find that surprising at all. Sometimes in the
course of diplomatic negotiations we're ready to share with you lots of
details and sometimes we're not, and this is the latter case.
These are very delicate, complex negotiations. We think that
success has a better chance if we do not talk about the specifics in
public, but rather reserve them to the private conversation. Since
Ambassador Frasure has been in Belgrade all week and has not had a
chance to report personally to the Secretary on this and we've not had a
chance to talk by phone, I think it would irresponsible for me to get
into the detail. I'm not the negotiator.
(The briefing concluded at 1:56 p.m.)
END
|