Compact version |
|
Friday, 22 November 2024 | ||
|
Cyprus PIO: Turkish Press and Other Media, 05-12-09Cyprus Press and Information Office: Turkish Cypriot Press Review Directory - Previous Article - Next ArticleFrom: The Republic of Cyprus Press and Information Office Server at <http://www.pio.gov.cy/>TURKISH PRESS AND OTHER MEDIA No.236/05 09.12.05[A] NEWS ITEMS
[B] COMMENTARIES, EDITORIALS AND ANALYSIS
[A] NEWS ITEMS[01] The self-styled assembly decided the urgent discussion of the new draft law regarding the occupied Greek Cypriot propertiesTurkish Cypriot daily KIBRIS newspaper (09.12.05) reports that the self-styled assembly decided yesterday the urgent discussion of the new draft law regarding the occupied Greek Cypriot properties. The National Unity Party (UBP) and the Peace and Democracy Movement (BDH) voted against the proposal for urgent discussion.Addressing the assembly, the MP of UBP, Mr Huseyin Ozgurgun argued that there was no need for the urgent discussion of the draft-law, which is not in harmony with the constitution. The committee of the assembly, he said, has to study the draft-law from the point of view of its compatibility with the constitution. Mr Ozgurngun criticized the provision in the draft-law for return of properties, added that they could not support such a law and wondered why the public opinion was not informed before about a draft-law, which was so important that the postponement of the discussions of the budget was considered necessary so that it is discussed. The leader of the Democratic Party (DP), Mr Serdar Denktas said that the law was urgent because it is an international necessity. He claimed that the government prepared the draft-law because it was necessary to show its good intentions and added that for this reason the Loizidou case was postponed for two months. He noted that they must show their good will before the end of the Aresti case at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). Mr Denktas said that the MPs have been briefed on this issue during a closed-door meeting at the so-called presidency and criticized the discussions which make people worry. Mr Denktas pointed out that motherland Turkey needs help and added that either they will help Turkey or they will say we do not care; in any event the cases are not filed against us. He said that there are some mistakes in the draft-law, that these mistakes will be corrected, that he does not know whether or not they will be able to create local remedies, but they have to try to do this and that this will be a relief from the point of view of the ECHR and an important gain for the Turkish Cypriots as well. Mr Denktas added that the Turkish Cypriots do not have a say on the (occupied Greek Cypriot) properties they posses today and that trying to find a method to change this is an important duty for them. Mr Denktas said that his party approves the urgent discussion of the draft-law, but he could not say that they would have a positive vote in case changes are not made in the law. Mr Denktas noted that Turkey will have to face much more financial compensations in case this draft-law is not approved and concluded saying that they have a debt of loyalty to Turkey. Furthermore, the leader of the BDH, Mr Akinci said that they are working on this new draft-law and therefore they could not vote positively for the urgent discussion. He added, however, that they would evaluate the content of the draft-law according to the developments. Meanwhile, the leader of the Republican Turkish Party (CTP), Mr Ferdi Sabit Soyer said that the return of occupied properties to their Greek Cypriot owners was decided at the ECHR and added that during the next two months they have to tour within the population living in the occupied part of the Republic of Cyprus in order to convince them about the draft-law. Referring to the issue, Turkish Cypriot daily VOLKAN newspaper (09.12.05) argues that the MPs of DP, who have many times stated that the draft-law is contrary to the constitution changed their mind and approved the urgent discussion of the issue. The paper claims that Mr Serdar Denktas reiterates the hesitant stance he showed during the referendum. It is alleged that during the voting for the draft-law he will let the DP MPs to vote whatever they wish. In that case, some of them will not participate in the voting and others will refrain from voting, notes VOLKAN which expresses the opinion that this means that the DP supports the draft-law and the stance of the CTP and Prime Minister Erdogans Justice and Development Party (AKP). Meanwhile, Mr Rauf Denktas, former Turkish Cypriot leader, stated that nobody can play games with the territory and that with the draft-law they made the country upside down. [02] UNFICYP call on the Turkish side to stop work at Ledra Street. Reaction by SoyerIllegal Bayrak television (08/12/05) broadcast the following:The United Nations Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus has issued a statement
calling on the two sides in Cyprus to cooperate in good faith with each
other and with the United Nations to open a crossing point at the
Lokmac1 area in Lefkoa.
In the statement UNFICYP states that it is unable to support or
facilitate the opening of the proposed crossing at Lokmac1 area in the
absence of the consent of both parties.
Reaffirming that the construction undertaken by the Turkish Cypriot
side is outside the buffer zone, UNFICYP says, however, that it is its
view that the ongoing work should cease, and that both sides should
resume efforts to find mutually acceptable arrangements for the opening
of such a crossing point.
The statement was also critical of the Turkish Cypriot side for taking
a preemptive stance to execute its project and persisting in acting
unilaterally toward an objective that by definition must be bilateral.
Reacting to UNFICYP´S statement the self styled Prime Minister Mr
Ferdi Sabit Soyer, said the United Nations should feel free to announce
which of the two parties concerned has been dragging its feet on a
matter on which there was already a convergence of views and
preliminary consent, as well as initiatives to a certain degree.
This had exactly - been the case also in the opening of the Bostanc1
(occupied Zodia) Gate in the past he said, accusing both the United
Nations and the European Union of not fulfilling their
responsibilities on the issue.
Mr Soyer expressed the view that the side with good intentioned and
peaceful policies aimed at achieving a solution to the Cyprus problem
is continuously being dealt blows, while the side which keeps
preventing the opening of the crossing point is being supported.
This he said, will definitely not help the UN efforts aimed at
achieving a solution to the Cyprus Problem.
Gul said that among the topics discussed at the NAC meeting were
Afghanistan, Kosovo, Middle East, peace process between Palestine and
Israel and the Balkans. "We also discussed about the possible expansion
of NATO," said Gul.
Mr Gul informed NATO leaders about this week's summit of the
Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) in Mecca, Saudi Arabia.
Answering a question on Cyprus, Gul stressed that the topic of Cyprus
occasionally comes on the agenda of the EU. "However, a solution will
come from the United Nations," expressed Gul.
In response to remarks made by French Premier Villepin today that the
parliaments and politicians can not write history, Gul noted that
indeed parliaments are not places of scientific research. "Every one
knows this fact. At times, there are parliaments that make mistakes."
Moreover, on Mr Gul´s statements Turkish Cypriot Halkin Sesi newspaper
(09/12/05) quotes him to have said: The EU should not contribute to the
non solution, consciously or unconsciously. Turkey and the Turkish
Cypriots are in wait. The EU must not loose its credibility. Mr Gul
also met with the U.S. Secretary of State Ms Condoleezza Rice.
The paper reports that Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Guls telephone
conversation with Olli Rehn yesterday was effective in the Commissions
changing of its stance.
The paper reports that the arrested people were involved in collecting
20 thousand sterling.
The paper publishes the names of the suspects as follows: Halil
Falyali, Ali Falyali and so called Police inspector, responsible for
Trikomo Region Police Station Veli Gurpinar.
KIBRIS reports that the suspects yesterday appeared before the so
called Famagusta court which issued two days remand order.
The suspects are accused of being involved in robbery, committing
crime, raceteering, forming secret affiliations with a view to coercing
people into paying money, intimidation and blackmailing.
The paper reports that the fourth suspect Cemal Adak, is in the United
Kingdom, and efforts are being made with the Scotland Yard to arrest
Adak as well.
The investigation which lead to arrests of the three suspects opened
when Serdar Sari living in Britain complained to the British police
that his life is under threat, and gave the names of the suspects who
were demanding 20 thousand sterling from him.
The so called police will continue the investigation.
The application will be discussed and evaluated during the meeting of
the EHF which is going to take place at St. Petersburg in May 2006.
Commenting on the issue the chairman of the Turkish Cypriot Handball
Federation Mr Zafer Can, stated that he believes that it will be useful
for them to be at St. Petersburg, at the time the issue of the
membership will be discussed. He said at this meeting the future of the
handball team will be determined and added that they try to find money
in order to be able make this trip.
Mueller, who arrived in the Turkish capital early Friday morning, is to
meet with Gokhan Aydiner, director general of security and Interior
Minister Abdulkadir Aksu.
He is also expected to have lunch with high-ranking Turkish security
officials before departing to return to Washington. It is believed that
the issue of al-Qaeda operations in Turkey and investigative
co-operation would be discussed during the meetings.
The FBI director has been carrying out a round of visits to see the
operations of equivalent agencies abroad.
Interior Minister Abdulkadir Aksu has reacted to the "alcohol ban"
debates. Aksu said: "We are not introducing any bans. On the
contrary, it is now easier to obtain a liquor license; the bureaucracy
has been cut back. With the directive, the gained rights are
protected.
This topic is being used to undermine our party. The regulations for
identifying liquor establishments came out 71 years ago. The provision
in all the directives issued to date stating that a commission would
rule on those places where liquor establishments were to be opened
stays on in this directive, too. The directive states that the
municipal assembly is to decide on the location of liquor
establishments in accordance with the local authority's opinion if the
establishment falls within the municipal limits, or by the provincial
assembly if the establishment falls outside of municipal limits. In
other words, it is simply a transfer of authority.
In fact, we have made it easier to obtain a license. We eliminated the
bureaucracy. Tourist, historical or cultural locations will be
identified as liquor locations. What we are doing is the exact
opposite of what is being written and said. Gained rights are being
protected. There is no request for a "red street" project; nor could
any such request be made."
According to the results of the poll on the "Election System and
Political Parties' Democratic Values" that was conducted by the
Politics Center Association, 34% of the respondents described the army
as "the most trustworthy" institution. AKP [Justice and Development
Party] Afyonkarahisar Deputy Mahmut Kocak is the board chairman of this
association. Some 72% of the respondents asserted that they are not
pleased with the performance of the political government, and 73% noted
that there is no intra-party democracy in the political parties.
Holding a press conference yesterday, Kocak and Assistant Prof Dr Idris
Bal, director of the association, provided information on the study, in
which 16 deputies from the AKP, the CHP [Republican People's Party],
and ANAP [Motherland Party] took part. Kocak and Bal emphasized that
the deputies did not give the poll much credit.
The Politics Center Association, whose board members also include
deputies from the AKP, the CHP, and ANAP, was established in 2004. In
the poll conducted by the association in question 25 questions were
posed to 1,179 persons who were randomly selected. The deputies also
participated in the poll. The results of the poll are as follows:
-- Some 72% of the respondents noted that they are not pleased with the
performance of the political government, while 28% answered that they
are pleased with its performance.
-- Some 68% of the respondents believe that the election system is not
democratic. Some 62% of the 68% do not believe that the 10% election
threshold stabilizes the administration.
-- The respondents were asked to name the institution that they find
most trustworthy. Some 34% of the respondents answered "the army," 15%
answered "the President's Office," nine percent answered
"nongovernmental organizations," eight percent answered "the political
parties," six percent answered "the TBMM [Turkish Grand National
Assembly], three percent answered "the judicial system," and 0.4%
replied "the press." Some 25 percent of the respondents answered
"none."
-- The respondents were asked: "On which side of the political fan do
you take place?" Some 39% answered "none of the sides," nine percent
asserted that they are "socialists," 12% described themselves as
"liberals," 21% noted that they are "conservatives," and 13% answered
that they are "social democrats."
-- Some 68% of the respondents do not expect early elections to be held
prior to 2007.
-- Some 73% of the respondents want the president to be elected by the
people. This answer reportedly shows that the trust in the President's
Office has eroded.
-- The respondents were asked: "Which party's structure and leader
profile are more democratic?" Some 28% of the respondents answered the
AKP, 12% answered ANAP, 10% answered the CHP, eight percent answered
the DYP [True Path Party], and seven percent answered the MHP
[Nationalist Action Party].
Some 72% of the respondents asserted that they are not pleased with the
government's performance. This answer was analyzed as follows:
"The respondents' answers show that the public support for the
government, which had come to power with approximately 34% of the
votes, has dropped. Nevertheless ruling parties are usually worn out
and therefore they lose votes. Given this fact, it is possible to say
that the government still enjoys a seriously high popularity rate. As
the people's education level decreases, the support for the government
grows."
The fact that in answer to the question of "which institution they find
most trustworthy," only three percent answered "the judicial system"
and the fact that this rate placed the judicial system at the second
place from the bottom constituted the most important surprise. This
result was analyzed as follows: "Some 38% of the university students
marked 'the army,' while 30% of those who finished primary and
secondary school marked the 'none of the above.' The assumption that
the judicial system is open to intervention (political intervention)
and the fact that the manifestation of justice is delayed in most of
the cases may be seen as the reasons for the deterioration of the
confidence in the judicial system."
He must have felt bored during his visit to New Zeland, because the
prime minister reportedly shifted his visit to Australia one day ahead
and, leaving the accompanying businessmen and journalists behind at the
first stop, he flew to the "fifth continent."
Let us write a small scenario and let us assume that at the airport the
Turkish ambassador gave Erdogan the notes regarding a rather unordinary
poll that was conducted in his country.
You certainly wish to know the three striking issues that the
respondents of this poll agreed upon. The poll entitled "The Election
System and Political Parties' Democratic Values" was conducted in
Ankara with the participation of 1,179 respondents who were selected
randomly.
The residents of the country's capital listed the most trustworthy
institutions as the army, the president, and the nongovernmental
organizations respectively.
Three of every four persons -- in other words, 72% of the respondents
-- noted that they are not pleased with the government.
The answer that appears in the third line also explains why the people
did not include the political parties which should be considered
"indispensable in a democratic order" among the most trustworthy
institutions, that were mentioned in the first line. Many people agree
that there is no intra-party democracy in most of the political
parties.
If we continue with our small scenario, we may rightfully note that it
was difficult for the prime minister to understand why he was given the
note that included the [results of this] poll. And then, he was told
that it was AKP Afyon Deputy Dr Mahmut Kocak who had this poll
conducted.
A deputy of the ruling party checked the pulse of the people by posing
questions to 1,179 citizens via the Politics Center Association that is
headed by this deputy. And the pulse of the people showed that the two
institutions that mostly irritate the AKP -- the army and the
president's office -- top the list of the most trustworthy
institutions!
How would you assess the situation if you were the AKP chairman? How
would you assess the situation especially when you found out that 72%
of the respondents are not pleased with the performance of the team, of
which you were the captain?
The fact that yet another "Dr Parliamentarian" -- Balikesir Deputy
Turhan Comez -- had the floor yesterday and cried out that "they are
not lead soldiers' may also be viewed as the reflection of this 72% on
the AKP group. Everyone knows that Comez has been distressed with the
course of the developments for quite a while. Nonetheless, the AKP
administrators did not believe that this distress would grow so much
that it would have an impact on the speech Comez gave during
yesterday's closed session.
Given the failures in his electoral district, Dr Comez ensured his
observations regarding the entire country were recorded in the minutes
of the AKP group meeting. Asking why [Turkey] kept silent regarding
the mysterious CIA flights that caused huge controversy among the
European public, Comez especially emphasized that "he has hundreds of
issues, about which he wants to ask each and every minister
questions." He also explained that he and his other deputy colleagues
have the right to discuss such issues. He wanted to know why "the
discussions on supra-identity-sub identity and the concept of
constitutional citizenship that currently appear on Turkey's agenda are
not discussed on the group's platform."
He said: "If we are not satisfied and if we do not maintain our hope,
we will not be able to convey healthy messages to the people."
In short, AKP deputies who want to end their silence are coming to the
fore one after the other. Some of them talk about the polls and the
others talk about the cries that reach them from these polls. It is
true that the poll conducted by Dr Mahmut Kocak shows that the AKP is
still the most popular political party in Turkey, but contrary to what
certain people have been happily claiming lately, the AKP's popularity
rate has not reached 40%. In fact, it has dropped to 28%. Furthermore,
the liberals who had supported the AKP during the 3 November 2002
elections and who had extended full support to Erdogan until recently
are changing their way. On the other hand, the AKP has the support of
approximately 47% of the conservative sector.
This way, it is easier to understand why the ruling party has recently
turned into an eagle where the Islamic headgear and the alcohol
prohibition issues are concerned. Furthermore, certain circles are
trying to turn the hearing in Van that I mentioned in my article
yesterday into a torment for Yucel Askin. Within the framework of the
plot that is being staged, the petitions of 448 wronged persons who
wish to seek their rights have been placed in the file and preparations
are being made for enabling each and every one of these persons to pose
questions to the defendant rector separately. These efforts also have
a special meaning.
Briefly, it is understood that those who used to formerly adopt the
National View line and who allegedly underwent change are currently
getting bored with the new shirt that they have been wearing for a
while and they are making preparations for announcing that they miss
the clothes that they have in their cupboard.
For those who know that the boat is aimlessly sailing in dangerous
waters where the economy is concerned and that it is no longer possible
to conceal the disappointment that is felt regarding issues such as
northern Iraq and Cyprus the answer to this question is certainly "why
not" with the condition that it is spread over a long period of time.
/ES
|