|
|
CSCE
27th MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE OF SENIOR OFFICIALS
PRAGUE 1994
JOURNAL No. 2
2nd DAY OF THE 27th MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE
- Date: Tuesday, 14 June 1994
- Opened: 10.30 a.m.
- Suspended: 1.05 p.m.
- Resumed: 3.25 p.m.
- Suspended: 6.55 p.m.
- Resumed: 8.20 p.m.
- Closed: 10.30 p.m.
- Chairman: Mr. P. Bruni (Italy)
- Subjects discussed:
- Agenda item 3:
- Request for admission to the CSCE as a
participating State
- Agenda item 4:
- Activity of the CSCE institutions:
- Report by: the Director of the ODIHR
- Agenda item 5:
- Further development of the capabilities of the
CSCE in conflict prevention and crisis
management
- Agenda item 6:
- Situation in the CSCE region. Current issues
and CSCE involvement:
- CSCE focus on Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia,
Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro)
- Political situation in Crimea (Ukraine).
CSCE involvement
- Information on the implementation of
paragraph 15 of the Helsinki Summit
Declaration 1992
- Other current issues and CSCE involvement
- Agenda item 7:
- Further development of the role of the CSCE:
- Co-operation and contacts with the
United Nations as well as with European
and transatlantic organizations and
institutions
- Relations between the CSCE and the
European Union initiative on the Pact for
Stability
- Integration of recently admitted
participating States
- Statements:
- Agenda item 3:
- Greece, Holy See, Albania, Russian Federation,
Slovenia, United States of America, Bulgaria,
Poland, Sweden, Croatia, Germany, United
Kingdom, Switzerland, Turkey, Slovak Republic,
Iceland, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Denmark, Finland,
Italy, France, Norway, Ireland, Netherlands,
Belarus, Czech Republic, Chairman
It was the understanding of the Chair that there was no
objection to allowing the former Yugoslav Republic of
Macedonia to take the floor at the current session on this
issue.
The delegation of the former Yugoslav Republic
of Macedonia
The Chairman announced with regret his understanding that
there was no consensus on the request (see CSCE Communication
No. 21/Rev.1) for admission to the CSCE as a participating
State by the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, currently
an observer in the CSCE process, and that the overwhelming
majority within the CSCE requested that this question be
resolved positively and with the utmost urgency.
The delegation of Albania stated: "Mr. Chairman, I asked for
the floor, on behalf of this delegation, in order to clarify
the position of the Albanian Government vis vis the request
of Macedonia for membership of the CSCE.
Macedonia has applied for full participation in this forum for
some time now. Albania, for its part, has not hesitated to
present, both in the bilateral contacts and through this
forum, its arguments which made it limit its consensus to the
observer status for Macedonia. For the sake of clarity and in
order to avoid any misunderstanding which might arise on this
issue, this delegation would like to reiterate that our
reservations were related exclusively to the rights of
Albanians living in Macedonia.
Our reservations concerning the situation of the Albanians in
Macedonia were not prejudicial of the attitude of the Albanian
Government as to bilateral relations in other fields.
Desirous of good neighbourliness and mutual respect, we have
tried to overcome situations of distrust, looking for a higher
level of relationship with our neighbour. This purpose was
served by various meetings at different levels, the most
important being the last summit between Berisha and Gligorov,
which was considered by both sides as the most fruitful, that
opens up vistas for further extension and rapid development of
our relations in various fields. We have concluded so far
several mutually important agreements; indeed most recently
we have signed the agreement on technical and scientific
co-operation, and work is going ahead for the conclusion of an
agricultural agreement. Offering our transport and trade
facilities to Macedonia after the embargo is an expression of
our goodwill for good neighbourly and stable relations. We
think that where there's a will there's a way, and any
particular obstacle can be easily overcome.
To this end, and with its requests to the Macedonian
Government, the Government of Albania has not only meant the
realization in practice of the rights that the Albanian
population living there is entitled to, but also the
stabilization of the ethnic situation in Macedonia and the
prevention of its further deterioration; we have judged, and
still continue to do so, that the Albanians, both on account
of their number and their activity, constitute an essential
factor of the overall internal life of the Macedonian State.
In our opinion, this fact is undoubtedly connected with the
activity of preventing ethnic conflicts in the region.
This delegation wishes to frame all the above reasons with the
responsibility of each participating State to observe and
respect all the CSCE documents and their commitments and
principles, as well as efforts of this forum to be effectively
involved in preventive diplomatic activity. We have
considered all this both as a fundamental right and as an
obligation.
We take particular pleasure in noting that the census is to be
held by the end of this month, and we very much hope
everything will proceed as it should.
This undertaking represents an important step towards the just
and overall settlement of the problems of the Albanians. Our
bilateral meetings, the positive impact of the presence of the
CSCE mission and the successful activation of the CSCE High
Commissioner on National Minorities constitute a good basis
which will help for a serious and careful approach, full of
attention, towards the requests of the Albanians by the
Government of Macedonia.
Mr. Chairman, my country joins its voice with all those
delegations that give their consensus for the full membership
of Macedonia in the CSCE. We sincerely hope that this move
will be considered as an invitation to the Macedonian
Government for a more effective co-operation, goodwill and
disposition as regards the questions relating to the position
of the Albanians living there. We are firmly convinced that
Macedonia will also rely on the relevant expertise of the CSCE
and its mechanisms to continuously and carefully address this
question.
On the other hand, it is our conviction that the presence of
Macedonia in this forum is an important factor which, now more
than ever before, should be viewed realistically rather than
emotionally; in doing so we take into account the current
regional situation, and the valuable contribution which it
could make to regional stability. This has been the major
reason why Albania was among the first countries to recognize
the independent State of Macedonia.
In conclusion, Mr. Chairman, I would like to strongly
reiterate the opinion of this delegation that only a just,
serious and continuous approach to the requests of the
Albanians there, will turn out to be a fundamental lasting
element of stability for Macedonia and for the entire region.
We therefore appeal that the census, as the first step, be
soon followed by the fulfilment of other commitments by the
Macedonian Government towards the Albanians, as foreseen in
the regular reports of the CSCE mission and the CSCE High
Commissioner on National Minorities. On this occasion, I
would like to ask the Chairman to kindly record this statement
in the Journal of this meeting, as well as our request to keep
this item and its follow-up on the agenda also after the full
participation of Macedonia."
- Agenda item 4:
- Director of the ODIHR, Turkey, Greece-European
Union, Denmark, Poland, Kyrgyzstan, United
States of America, Chairman
- Agenda item 5:
- Italy (as Chairman of the Permanent Committee
of the CSCE), Greece-European Union, Russian
Federation, United States of America, United
Kingdom, Turkey, Canada, Switzerland, Germany,
Sweden, Finland, Chairman
- Agenda item 6:
- Chairman
- Albania, Greece-European Union, Canada,
Russian Federation, Bosnia-Herzegovina,
Bulgaria, Turkey, Slovak Republic,
Hungary, Sweden, Austria, United States of
America, Holy See, Secretary General of
the CSCE, Chairman
Contribution by Japan
- Italy (as Representative of the
Chairman-in-Office responsible for CSCE
missions), Ukraine, Hungary, Greece-
European Union, Russian Federation,
France, Poland, Turkey, United States of
America, Canada, Finland, Slovak Republic,
Estonia, Czech Republic, Romania, Germany,
Moldova, Austria, Sweden, Norway, Chairman
- Estonia, United States of America,
Lithuania, Sweden, Canada, Iceland,
Poland, Finland, Chairman
- Moldova, Ukraine, Romania, Poland, Russian
Federation, United States of America,
Greece-European Union, Turkey, United
Kingdom, Chairman
- Agenda item 7:
- Chairman, United States of America,
Switzerland, Poland, Canada, Norway,
Bulgaria, Representative of the Secretary-
General of the United Nations, Albania
- Greece-European Union (address by the
Chairman of the European Union ad hoc
high-level working group on the Pact for
Stability), Estonia, Slovak Republic,
Hungary, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania,
France, Turkey, Cyprus, Chairman
- Secretary General of the CSCE, Greece-
European Union, United States of America,
Romania, Sweden, Austria, Kyrgyzstan,
Liechtenstein, Turkey, Chairman
- Chairman's statement:
Under agenda item 4 above,
"It is the understanding of the Chair that the Committee of
Senior Officials has expressed appreciation for the efforts
going on in the informal Financial Committee of Experts based
on the Secretary General's proposal as complemented by the
ODIHR for the establishment of a comprehensive system for
personnel classification and pay structure for all CSCE staff.
The importance was underlined of getting this issue resolved
as soon as possible. Therefore the Permanent Committee is
asked to make the necessary arrangements so that the informal
Financial Committee of Experts finalizes its recommendations
before the summer break and that these recommendations be
thereafter placed on the agenda of the Permanent Committee of
the CSCE."
- Next meeting:
- Wednesday, 15 June 1994, at 10 a.m., in the Plenary hall
Chair: Italy
|