U.S. Department of State
1997 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report, March 1998
United States Department of State
Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs
Europe and Central Asia
UZBEKISTAN
I. Summary
Uzbekistan is part of an important transshipment route for Southwest
Asian narcotics heading for Russia and Europe. While the government
continues to profess its commitment to the fight against drugs, it made
virtually no progress on counternarcotics legislation or a counternarcotics
master plan in 1997. Law enforcement agencies seized some two and a half
tons of illicit narcotics, but their efforts are hampered by limited
resources and a lack of coordination among the various agencies assigned
counternarcotics responsibilities. The Government of Uzbekistan (GOU) is
talking about devoting additional resources to demand reduction, but
education programs are in their infancy and treatment has not advanced
beyond Soviet methods. A party to the 1988 UN Drug Convention, Uzbekistan
is trying to expand cooperation with the United Nations, the United States,
and other western countries.
II. Status of Country
Uzbekistan is part of an attractive and increasingly important
transshipment route for opium and cannabis products moving from southwest
Asia toward Russia and Europe. Precursor chemicals which originate in
Russia, Ukraine, and east Asia also move through the country to heroin
laboratories in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Uzbekistan was formerly a
moderate producer of opium poppies, but government programs have all but
eradicated the crop in recent years.
III. Country Actions Against Drugs in 1997
Policy Initiatives/Accomplishments. Uzbekistan took no significant
counternarcotics policy initiatives in 1997. The country also made no
progress in developing a counternarcotics master plan. Amendments to
narcotics-related sections of the criminal codes as well as a separate "law
on narcotics," remain in the drafting stage. Current Uzbek legislation
meets the basic requirements of the 1988 UN Drug Convention, in that
illicit cultivation, production, sales distribution, and transport are
properly criminalized. However, money laundering legislation and
extradition and mutual legal assistance treaties are non-existent, and
asset seizure regulations are vague. Moreover, Uzbek counternarcotics laws,
like much of the criminal code, fall short of international standards on
such issues as due process.
There are currently three UNDCP projects operating in Uzbekistan. The
first is a regional project (also involving Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan)
attempting to improve interdiction along a key trafficking route into
Uzbekistan's Fergana Valley. The second is an institution-building project,
attempting to establish a separate National Drug Intelligence Unit. The
final project is providing support to Uzbekistan Institute of Genetics
efforts to create an effective opium-poppy-specific pathogen.
Law Enforcement Efforts. Uzbekistan's various law enforcement
agencies seized 2.5 million metric tons of illicit drugs in 1997, roughly
three-fourths of it opium. This represents a considerable decline from the
more than seven tons seized last year, but the decline is probably
attributable more to the absence of any one large seizure than to any
decline in trafficking activity or effectiveness in Uzbek law enforcement
efforts. The closure of the Uzbek-Afghan border at Termez because of
fighting in northern Afghanistan may also have contributed to the
decline.
Three separate agencies--the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MVD), the
National Security Service (NSS), and the State Customs Committee--have
responsibilities for various aspects of counternarcotics activities. Each
of these agencies has a professional cadre of officers and sections that
focus on narcotics. In the MVD, for example, 150 officers work in the
counternarcotics department. Interdiction efforts are mostly at border
inspection points. Authorities use dogs, and have military helicopters
available to assist in interdiction and eradication efforts.
However, all of these entities suffer from resource constraints, and,
since none actually specializes in counternarcotics operations--the NSS is
a National Intelligence and Security Service, the MVD, a National Police
Force, and Customs concentrates more on collecting taxes and duties and
preventing the import of illegal food, alcohol, and tobacco than on
drugs--counternarcotics efforts rarely receive sufficient funding. Also,
outside of the counternarcotic-specific subsections, many law enforcement
officers have multiple responsibilities and lack adequate knowledge of drug
control procedures.
Moreover, couternarcotics efforts are sometimes hamstrung by rivalry,
mistrust, and lack of coordination among these agencies. A National Drug
Information Analytical Center, established to coordinate these diffuse
efforts, has not been able to compel the other agencies to cooperate, and
has at times become merely a fourth competing counternarcotics entity.
In August, the Customs Service received an increase in status with the
establishment of an independent State Customs Committee. Previously,
Customs had been under the State Tax Committee. In early 1997, the Customs
Service opened its own dog training center in Tashkent. The center has so
far trained a handful of GOU dogs and their handlers. Eventually, the
Uzbeks would like the center to serve the entire region.
Corruption. Uzbekistan has laws against corruption, but none
specifically targeting narcotics-related corruption. There were no major
narcotics-related corruption cases in 1997. Customs and, to a lesser
extent, the MVD have reputations for corruption. Law enforcement officials'
low salaries--which are often received several months late--make them
susceptible to bribery and other forms of corruption.
Agreements and Treaties. Uzbekistan is a party to the 1988 UN
Drug Convention. Uzbekistan and the United States signed a Letter of
Agreement for provision of USG counternarcotics assistance in December
1997. The United States has no Extradition or Mutual Legal Assistance
Treaty with Uzbekistan, but a precedent has been established for
cooperation in the apprehension of Uzbek fugitives in the United
States. One case involved an FBI task force which targetted a Russian
organized crime group and identified two Uzbek fugitives involved in visa
fraud. Further investigation revealed that the two were fugitives from
justice in Uzbekistan where they were wanted for more serious
crimes. Police officials from Uzbekistan traveled to the United States to
observe the arrest, and to participate in court proceedings.
The GOU did not sign counternarcotics agreements with any other
countries in 1997. An EU/TACIS delegation traveled to Uzbekistan in the
Spring of 1997 to explore opportunities for counternarcotics
assistance. Although no agreements have yet been reached, some EU
counternarcotics programs are likely to begin in 1998. A narcotics liaison
officer from the German Federal Police arrived in Tashkent in October; he
will be the first professional narcotics liaison officer from any country
to be based in central Asia. The United Kingdom also appears likely to step
up its counternarcotics assistance.
Cultivation and Production. Until the mid 1990's, Uzbekistan
produced a moderate opium crop, mostly in the Samarkand region near the
border with Tajikistan. GOU eradication efforts have been very successful
in recent years, and today only small, scattered plots remain. Uzbekistan's
"Operation Black Poppy-97" eradicated 3.7 hectares of opium poppy and 0.5
hectares of cannabis.
Drug Flow/Transit. Uzbekistan sits astride several routes through
which southwest Asian opium and cannabis reach Russia and Europe. The level
of drug trafficking remained steady, or perhaps even increased slightly, in
1997.
Currently, the key route from Afghanistan is via the Gorno-Badakhshan
region of Tajikistan, through Osh in Kyrgyzstan, and on into eastern
Uzbekistan's Andijon region. A secondary route from Afghanistan, but one of
growing significance, is through Turkmenistan, with the drugs generally
entering Uzbekistan through the lightly guarded Bukhara region. The direct
route across the Afghan-Uzbek border through the city of Termez has become
less appealing to traffickers now that the GOU, driven by concerns about
fighting in northern Afghanistan, has tightened security along that border,
effectively closing it. However, the concentration of resources along the
Uzbek-Afghan border has left the other border crossings even more
vulnerable. All of these drug trafficking routes continue from Uzbekistan
to Kazakhstan and Russia.
In addition to this southwest Asian traffic, narcotics grown in
Tajikistan also transit Uzbekistan en route to Russia. The main growing
area in Tajikistan is located just across the border from Uzbekistan, and
there have been numerous seizures along that border, particularly near the
towns of Urgut and Sariasia. In addition, Uzbek transport police regularly
apprehend drug smugglers on the Dushanbe-Moscow train.
In recent years, a reverse traffic in chemical precursors has begun to
appear in Uzbekistan. These chemicals transit Uzbekistan en route from
plants in Russia, Ukraine and east Asia to laboratories in Afghanistan and
Pakistan.
Demand Reduction. Although GOU officials have begun to publicly
call for increased attention to be paid to the problem of drug abuse,
Uzbekistan has been slow in establishing effective demand reduction
programs. There is currently no anti-drug program in Uzbekistan's public
schools, although service-oriented organizations like the Red Crescent and
the Muslim Religious Board have been active in this area. Uzbekistan
continues the Soviet practice of forced treatment of registered drug
addicts. There is no accurate data on the number of drug abusers in
Uzbekistan: there are roughly 17,000 addicts registered, but the UNDCP
estimates that there are at least 200,000 users in the country.
IV. US Policy Initiatives and Programs
Bilateral Cooperation. The United States continued its
counternarcotics cooperation with Uzbekistan in 1997. In June 1997, the
Uzbek Minister of Internal Affairs visited DEA headquarters and was briefed
on regional narcotics production and trafficking activity. The USG provided
audio-visual equipment to the dog training center. The Department of
Agriculture signed an agreement with the Institute of Genetics providing
support for its research into an opium-destroying pathogen.
The DEA conducted a basic drug enforcement seminar in Tashkent which was
attended by 40 GOU officials, including representatives from all of the key
counternarcotics agencies, in March. Another edition of this course,
featuring 10 attendees each from four different central Asian states, was
held in Budapest in May. Uzbek officials also attended DEA-sponsored
Narcotics Management and Forensic Chemists' Seminars in
Washington. Finally, the United States made earmarked contributions for
Uzbekistan to the UNDCP.
The Road Ahead. The USG will continue to provide training and,
where appropriate, equipment to the GOU to assist in its counternarcotics
efforts. The USG will urge the GOU to improve the legal and legislative
framework in this area. We will also, in concert with the UNDCP and other
western donors, push the GOU to cooperate more closely with its central
Asian neighbors and establish regional counternarcotics initiatives.
|