|
|
U.S. Department of State
1996 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report, March 1997
United States Department of State
Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs
Africa and the Middle East
NIGERIA
I. Summary
Nigeria is the focal point of West African narcotics trafficking. Illicit
drug producing and trafficking organizations in Asia, South America and,
increasingly, Nigeria itself, either use Nigeria as a transshipment point or
rely on Nigerian courier networks to transport Asian heroin and South American
cocaine destined for US and European markets. Nigerian trafficking
organizations are among the leading carriers of Southeast and Southwest Asian
heroin into the US. In addition, Nigerian traffickers ship cannabis--the only
illicit drug produced in Nigeria--to Europe and other West African countries.
The Government of Nigeria (GON) has failed to address corruption adequately
among law enforcement and other government agencies, hindering
counternarcotics efforts.
Nigerian trafficking organizations operate sophisticated money laundering
operations in addition to controlling courier networks. These organizations
have been quick to adapt in response to vigorous international law
enforcement. They have found new ways to evade detection and to alter and
expand their narcotics smuggling routes and markets. As GON counternarcotics
efforts have effectively reduced the amount of drugs shipped through
international airports in Nigeria, courier networks increasingly have relied
on overland shipments to transport narcotics. Nigerian trafficking
organizations actively recruit couriers of diverse nationalities, backgrounds
and ages.
II. Status of Country
Although not a significant producer of drugs or precursor chemicals, Nigeria
is a major transit country and the home base of many organizations involved in
international narcotics trafficking. Nigerian trafficking organizations
control courier networks that move heroin from Asia to the US and Europe and
cocaine from South America to Europe and South Africa. Most trafficking
through Nigeria is import/re-export oriented, with only a small percentage
imported for domestic consumption. The only illicit drug produced in Nigeria
is cannabis, which is exported primarily to Europe and, to a lesser extent,
other West African countries. Nigerian trafficking organizations also run
sophisticated money laundering operations. Of particular concern is the
export of Nigerian drug trafficking and money laundering activities to other
West African countries.
The GON first formulated a comprehensive drug control strategy in 1995. The
GON passed a comprehensive money laundering decree in February 1995 which
allows for the seizure of property and assets belonging to suspected narcotics
trafficking and money laundering organizations. Unfortunately, the GON has
not provided sufficient funding or support to adequately implement the decree.
The one positive indigenous force working to combat drug trafficking in
Nigeria is the Nigerian Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA), which has
attempted, albeit not yet successfully, to shift its focus from drug couriers
to leaders of narcotics trafficking organizations. Due to counternarcotics
efforts by the NDLEA, particularly at Lagos International Airport, some
Nigerian trafficking and money laundering organizations have relocated to
other West African countries or use businesses in neighboring countries as
fronts. They increasingly rely on overland methods of transporting narcotics
through neighboring countries whose ports and airports are less-tightly
monitored.
Nigeria's land borders are poorly patrolled and border patrol agencies are
rife with corruption. Nigerian and US authorities suspect that the amount of
drugs shipped through Nigeria's land borders far exceeds the amount that was,
or ever could be, shipped by air.
The NDLEA has taken steps to address corruption within its ranks, but has made
no effective efforts to address corruption in other agencies of government.
The NDLEA's efforts to cooperate with other Nigerian law enforcement agencies
are hindered by pervasive corruption in those agencies. The NDLEA also
suffers internally from an organizational culture that stifles initiative and
requires that all decisions be made at the top. Fear of stiff reprimand for
failed operations and possible accusations of corruption make agents reluctant
to take the initiative. Counternarcotics efforts have resulted in the arrests
of many couriers, but few major traffickers; controlling organizations remain
intact. Perhaps the most glaring omission by the GON is its failure to
provide adequate funding for its law enforcement employees, thus making them
ever more vulnerable to bribery and related forms of corruption. Most law
enforcement employees are paid far less than is sufficient to feed, clothe and
house their families.
III. Country Action Against Drugs in 1996
Policy Initiatives. There were no major positive policy initiatives in
1996. The GON did not enact any new counternarcotics legislation. Moreover,
plans were stymied to shift the focus of narcotics control operations from the
arrest of couriers to the prosecution of leaders of narcotics trafficking and
money laundering organizations in Nigeria.
Accomplishments. Nigeria made only marginal progress in counternarcotics
efforts during the year and did not meet the goals and objectives of the 1988
UN Convention, to which Nigeria is a signatory. The NDLEA conducted drug
raids and seizures primarily at airports, seaports and border checkpoints.
Authorities took few steps to reduce cannabis production in the country. GON
efforts focused primarily on the destruction of isolated cannabis fields and a
limited program to encourage crop substitution.
Law Enforcement Efforts. Nigeria's counternarcotics efforts were
inadequate in 1996. Narcotics control operations lack adequate funding and
training, and extraditions to the US have not been forthcoming as promised.
Counternarcotics operations also suffer from a lack of cooperation among the
NDLEA, police, immigration and customs. The first NDLEA-US DEA/Lagos joint
operation, which resulted in the arrest of eight traffickers, was less
successful than anticipated. The Nigerian agents' lack of experience,
insufficient follow-up investigation efforts and failure to pursue
higher-level players within the smuggling ring limited the results of the
operation. The lack of broader GON cooperation on other issues of
international concern adversely affect NDLEA efforts to cooperate with foreign
missions and law enforcement officials.
Corruption. There is rampant corruption at all levels of government which
facilitates narcotics trafficking and money laundering in Nigeria. The GON
has conducted publicity campaigns against corruption, but has achieved few
concrete results. During 1996, the NDLEA dismissed some agents (more than
600, according to the NDLEA's General Bamaiyi) under the Drug Agent Corruption
Decree of 1995 in an effort to combat corruption. Paradoxically, agents are
reluctant to take responsibility and unwilling to take action for fear that
failure may result in allegations of corruption or incompetence.
Decision-making responsibility is almost entirely centered at the uppermost
levels of the agency.
Agreements and Treaties. Nigeria is a party to the 1988 UN Convention,
the 1961 UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs and its 1972 Protocol, as well
as the 1971 UN Convention on Psychotopic Substances. The 1931 US-UK
extradition treaty, which was made applicable to Nigeria in 1935, is the legal
basis for US extradition requests. The US and Nigeria signed a Mutual Legal
Assistance Treaty (MLAT) in 1989, but it has not been ratified by the US
Senate. The GON and Nigeria Airways (Nigeria's national carrier) signed an
Air Carrier Agreement with US Customs in 1993.
Cultivation/Production. The only illicit drug cultivated and produced in
Nigeria is cannabis. Nigerian cannabis is produced mainly for domestic
consumption and export to Europe and other West African countries. It is
shipped in insignificant quantities to the US. The GON took only limited
steps to reduce cannabis production in the country during the year, destroying
some fields of cannabis and recommending crop substitution to farmers in
cannabis-producing regions.
Drug Flow/Transit. Nigeria was Africa's most significant transshipment
point in 1996. The shift of some Nigerian drug trafficking and money
laundering operations to neighboring West African countries has not resulted
in a decline in activity in Nigeria. Nigerian trafficking and money
laundering organizations have proven adept at devising new ways of subverting
law enforcement efforts and evading detection. Nigerian organizations
succeeded in altering and even expanding their smuggling efforts, primarily
through Nigeria's porous land borders, despite counternarcotics efforts by the
NDLEA.
Demand Reduction. Domestic drug abuse is rising in Nigeria. The GON
denies the existence of significant drug abuse in Nigeria and has repeatedly
implied that Nigeria's narcotics trafficking problems are the result of demand
in the US and Europe. There was no credible demand reduction program in
Nigeria in 1996.
IV. US Policy Initiatives and Programs
Policy Initiatives. The primary goal of US counternarcotics policy is the
reduction of trafficking in illicit drugs by Nigerian organizations,
particularly those dealing in heroin destined for the US. Achieving this goal
depends substantially on GON willingness to arrest and extradite major
traffickers and to enforce anti-conspiracy laws that allow for the prosecution
of those controlling courier networks. Operational cooperation, as well as
serious anti-corruption efforts, are essential to realizing this goal.
Bilateral Accomplishments. The NDLEA and the DEA office in Lagos
reactivated the USG-GON Joint Narcotics Task Force in November 1995. DEA/Lagos
supported NDLEA operations throughout 1996, providing information and guidance
in many NDLEA operations and one joint investigation. Nonetheless,
cooperation between the US and Nigeria fell far below USG expectations. There
was little significant change in either narcotics control law enforcement
efforts or government policy since the 1995 GON announcement of a narcotics
control strategy. Improved USG-GON cooperation can only be achieved if the
GON makes an effective effort to move forward with its narcotics control
strategy and takes significant steps to combat corruption at all levels of the
Nigerian Government. The USG is exploring the possibility of offering
counternarcotics assistance to the GON in the areas of training and
information sharing.
The Road Ahead. The USG will stress the importance the US attaches to
counternarcotics efforts and will seek full GON cooperation in the extradition
of prominent drug traffickers and other Nigerian citizens wanted in the US on
drug and related charges. The USG will press for the investigation, arrest
and prosecution of major drug traffickers and the dismantling of trafficking
organizations within Nigeria, in addition to the apprehension of couriers.
Furthermore, the USG will aggressively monitor GON willingness to share
information with the international community on narcotics trafficking and
money laundering organizations in Nigeria, and will look for effective GON
efforts to eradicate corruption in the government and promote cooperation
among law enforcement agencies. The USG will encourage the enforcement and
strengthening of money laundering and asset seizure and forfeiture laws, as
well as the reform of financial regulations to increase the integrity of
financial transactions. The USG will assist in viable counternarcotics
efforts and, depending upon Nigerian cooperation, will focus on training and
support programs aimed at strengthening the institutions responsible for
narcotics control operations in Nigeria.
|