THOUGH
there have boon great Mohammedan civilizations that have contributed much to the
world’s progress and have left imperishable monuments, they have not lasted.
They have arisen through the fundamentally noble character and intelligence of
the peoples that have founded them, and have flourished for a relatively short
time rather in spite of their creed than because of it. And, as is the case in
all religions, the example set by the originator has had a greater influence on
his disciples than his book. The Prophet is deeply reverenced by all
Mohammedans, who regard even one hair from his beard as having miraculous
power.
The
main facts of his life and his general character are known to them. These
salient facts will now be set forth without bias of hostility or irreverence. They are authentic and well established. The reader is
invited to confirm them and determine for himself whether or not they are
correctly stated:
1. Mohammed was a polygamist;
2.
After leaving Mecca and proceeding to
Mesina, where he established himself for a time, he
organized and conducted raids against caravans, which he robbed to replenish
his depleted treasury;
3. He besieged and
plundered towns for the booty, which acts he justified by “revelations”;
4. He ordered eight
hundred Jewish prisoners to be separated from their wives and children and
butchered and their bodies thrown into a trench. Their wives and families were
sold into captivity. This was the first Mohammedan massacre. (Draycatt’s
Mahomet, page 234 et eq)
5. He ordered ferocious
and inhuman punishments to be inflicted ; (Draycott, 253-254)
6. He removed his
enemies by murder and assassination.
We have seen how faithfully this example has been followed by the
Turks throughout the years, since the fall of Constantinople, and especially by
the Young Turks since their accession to power. But although
other branches of the Mohammedan race have shown conspicuous qualities of heart
and of head, yet a general study of the spread of that religion from its
inception reveals only too clearly the influence of the Prophet’s example as
well as of his teachings. Says Pears, already quoted:
“The history indeed, of Egypt, of Syria and of Asia Minor had
been a long series of massacres, culminating perhaps in that of Egypt
where in 1354, when the Christians were ordered to abjure their faith and
accept Mohammedanism and refused, a hundred thousand were put to death.”
Adrian
Fortescue, in his work, “The Lesser Eastern Churches”, has this
paragraph:
“In 1389, a great procession of Copts who had accepted Mohammed
under fear of death, marched through Cairo. Repenting of their apostasy, they
now wished to atone for it by the inevitable consequence of returning to
Christianity. So as they marched, they announced that they believed in Christ
and renounced Mohammed. They were seized and all the men were beheaded in an
open square before the women. But this did not terrify the women; so they, too,
were all martyred.”
Regarding
the Armenian massacres of our own time, Doctor Johannes Lepsius, to whose
masterly “Secret Report” reference has been made in earlier pages, makes
the following statement:
“We have lists before us of 550 villages whose surviving
inhabitants were converted to Islam with fire and sword; of 568 churches
thoroughly pillaged, destroyed and razed to the ground; of 282 Christian
churches transformed into mosques; of 21 Protestant preachers and 170
Gregorian (Armenian) who were, after enduring unspeakable tortures, murdered
after their refusal to accept Islam. We repeat, however, that these figures
reach only to the extent of our information, and do not by a long way reach to
the extent of the reality. Is this a religious persecution or is it not?”
Christianity, then, has been cleaned out of North Africa and the old
Byzantine Empire, the home of the early Fathers of the Church and of the Seven
Cities, largely by massacre; the Turk, when he burned Smyrna and made Asia
Minor solidly Mohammedan, finished a work that has been going on for centuries.
Not only have these methods been used for propagating
Mohammedanism, but the “Law of Apostates” prescribes death, forced separation
from wife and family, and loss of property and legal rights for any Moslem who
forsakes his faith and adheres to another. The fear of these dreadful
punishments is one of the reasons why there are so few converts from
Mohammedanism to Christianity. Doctor Samuel M. Zwennner, the learned
writer on Mohammedan matters, gives many examples of the application of this
law in his recent work, “The Law of Apostasy in Islam”.
An
example which came within my personal observation, the murder of the convert
of the International College at Smyrna, has already been referred to. This is
probably the same case as that cited by the Reverend Ralph Harlow, one time
pastor of the International College at Smyrna, in a pamphlet: “Outside the Walls of Smyrna his body was found, stabbed in
many places.”
The
Law of Apostasy, according to Zwemmer, is signed up by the Mohammedan
law-givers in the folloing words:
“As for Apostates, it is permitted to kill them by facing them
or coming upon them from behind, just as in the case of Polytheists. Secondly,
their blood, if shed, brings no vengeance. Thirdly, their property is the spoil
of true believers. Fourthly, their marriage ties become null and void.”
The educated, Europeanized Turk of Constantinople is a shrewd and
polished gentleman of seductive manners; but one thing must never be forgotten
by those interested, financially or otherwise, in the future of Turkey; that
country has been made “homogeneous” by a series of ferocious massacres
carefully planned and relentlessly carried out by just such polished and
seductive gentlemen, who have exploited Moslem fanaticism for their purposes,
and it is on that fanaticism that their power rests.
Next: Chapter XXXVI | Previous: Chapter XXXIV | Book Contents | Book main page